The Armenians and the Ottoman Genocides: An Open Wound in Modern History

The Ottoman Genocides of 1915-1923 stand as one of history's darkest chapters, claiming the lives of an estimated 1.5 million Armenians and hundreds of thousands of other Christian minorities. This systematic campaign of deportation, starvation, and mass killing targeted Armenians, Assyrians, and Greeks within the declining Ottoman Empire. Over a century later, these events remain a source of international tension, historical debate, and profound trauma for survivor communities and their descendants.

Armenian refugees during forced deportations in 1915. (Historical photograph)

Historical Background of the Ottoman Genocides

By the early 20th century, the once-vast Ottoman Empire was experiencing a steady decline, losing significant territory to other regional powers. This period of instability created conditions where minority populations, particularly Christians, became scapegoats for the empire's troubles.

Before 1915, Christians—including Armenians, Assyrians, and Greeks—were dispersed throughout the Ottoman Empire. Though they had lived under Ottoman rule for centuries, these communities maintained distinct cultural, religious, and linguistic identities. Armenians, numbering around 2.5 million, were the most prominent Christian minority, with significant populations in Eastern Anatolia.

The rise of the Young Turks movement, particularly the Committee of Union and Progress (CUP), brought increasingly nationalist policies aimed at "Turkification" of the empire. Following Ottoman defeats in the Balkan Wars (1912-1913), anti-Christian sentiment intensified as the empire's leadership sought to blame internal "enemies" for their military failures.

Map showing the territorial decline of the Ottoman Empire from its peak to 1914.

The Armenian Genocide: The Core of the Ottoman Genocides

The Armenian Genocide began on April 24, 1915, when Ottoman authorities arrested approximately 250 Armenian intellectuals and community leaders in Constantinople (Istanbul). This date is now commemorated as Armenian Genocide Remembrance Day. What followed was a systematic campaign of deportation, expropriation, abduction, torture, massacre, and starvation.

Armenian men were typically separated and killed outright. Women, children, and the elderly were sent on death marches toward the Syrian desert without adequate food, water, or shelter. Many died from dehydration and starvation, while others were abducted or killed by Ottoman soldiers and Kurdish irregulars. Those who survived the marches were often held in concentration camps.

By 1923, an estimated 1.5 million Armenians had perished, and the historic Armenian presence in Anatolia had been virtually erased. Thousands of Armenian cultural sites, including churches and schools, were destroyed, and Armenian property was confiscated and redistributed.

"I saw mutilated bodies of women and children, lying in ditches. It was a massacre... a systematic attempt to exterminate a whole people."

Henry Morgenthau, U.S. Ambassador to the Ottoman Empire (1913-1916)

Armenian orphans who survived the genocide, photographed in 1916.

Beyond Armenians: Other Victims of the Ottoman Genocides

While the Armenian Genocide has received the most international attention, the Ottoman campaign against Christians extended to other groups as well. The Assyrian Genocide claimed between 250,000 and 500,000 lives, while approximately 350,000 Greeks perished in what is sometimes called the Greek Genocide or Pontic Genocide.

The Assyrians, including Chaldeans, Nestorians, Syriacs, and Arameans, numbered between 500,000 and 600,000 in the Ottoman Empire before 1915. They faced persecution similar to the Armenians, with hundreds of thousands deported to the desert in death marches. Women were raped and enslaved, and many villages were massacred entirely.

The Greeks, who had a presence in Anatolia dating back to antiquity, became targets particularly after the Greek War of Independence established a separate Greek state in 1821. During World War I and the subsequent Greco-Turkish War (1919-1922), Ottoman forces committed widespread atrocities against Greek civilians, including mass deportations, forced labor, and massacres.

Assyrian refugees fleeing persecution, 1915-1916.

Greek civilians at Smyrna (now Izmir) in 1922 during the city's destruction.

Perpetrators and Methods of the Ottoman Genocides

The Ottoman Genocides were orchestrated primarily by the ruling Committee of Union and Progress (CUP), led by the triumvirate of Talaat Pasha, Enver Pasha, and Jemal Pasha. These leaders implemented policies that deliberately targeted Christian minorities for elimination.

The methods employed in the genocides included:

• Mass arrests and executions of community leaders and intellectuals
• Disarming and killing Armenian soldiers serving in the Ottoman army
• Forced deportations ("death marches") to the Syrian desert
• Establishment of concentration camps
• Systematic rape and sexual slavery of women and girls
• Forced conversion to Islam, particularly of women and children
• Confiscation of property and wealth
• Destruction of cultural heritage sites

The Ottoman government attempted to justify these actions by claiming that Armenians and other Christians posed a security threat during World War I, alleging that they were collaborating with Russia. However, historical evidence, including Ottoman government documents, demonstrates that the deportations and killings were not military necessities but part of a deliberate plan to eliminate these populations.

Young Turk leaders who orchestrated the Ottoman Genocides: Talaat Pasha, Enver Pasha, and Jemal Pasha.

International Response and Recognition of the Ottoman Genocides

During the genocides, numerous foreign witnesses—including diplomats, missionaries, and journalists—documented and reported the atrocities. American Ambassador Henry Morgenthau Sr., German military officers, and various European consular officials left detailed accounts of the systematic nature of the killings.

In the aftermath of World War I, the Ottoman authorities briefly held trials for some perpetrators. A local governor, Mehmed Kemal, was found guilty and hanged for mass killings of Armenians, while the top Young Turk leaders were sentenced to death in absentia after fleeing abroad.

Today, the Armenian Genocide has been formally recognized by over 30 countries, including the United States (as of 2021), France, Germany, Russia, and Canada. The International Association of Genocide Scholars affirms that the events constitute genocide, stating it is "the overwhelming opinion of scholars who study genocide."

However, recognition of the Assyrian and Greek genocides has been more limited, with only 9 countries acknowledging these aspects of the broader Ottoman Christian Genocide. This disparity is partly due to the Armenian diaspora's more organized advocacy efforts compared to those of Assyrian and Greek communities.

The Armenian Genocide Memorial complex (Tsitsernakaberd) in Yerevan, Armenia.

Explore Recognition Efforts

Download our comprehensive guide to international recognition of the Ottoman Genocides, including timelines, government resolutions, and academic statements.

Download Recognition Guide

Turkish Denial and Its Impact

The Republic of Turkey, successor state to the Ottoman Empire, has consistently denied that the events of 1915-1923 constituted genocide. The official Turkish position acknowledges that atrocities occurred but argues there was no systematic attempt to destroy the Christian Armenian people, claiming that many Muslim Turks also died during the turmoil of war.

This denial has significant consequences:

Diplomatic Tensions

Turkey has withdrawn ambassadors and issued protests when countries officially recognize the Armenian Genocide. Relations with Armenia remain strained, with no official diplomatic ties between the countries.

Legal Repercussions

Turkey's Article 301, which prohibits "insulting Turkishness," has been used to prosecute writers and scholars who discuss the Armenian Genocide, including Nobel laureate Orhan Pamuk.

For survivors and their descendants, this denial represents a "double killing"—first the physical destruction of their communities, then the erasure of that crime from history. It prevents closure and reconciliation while perpetuating historical trauma across generations.

Protest in Turkey against international recognition of the Armenian Genocide.

Diaspora Communities and the Legacy of the Ottoman Genocides

The Ottoman Genocides created vast diaspora communities of Armenians, Assyrians, and Greeks scattered across the world. Today, more Armenians live outside the Republic of Armenia than within it, with large communities in Russia, the United States, France, and the Middle East.

These diaspora communities have played crucial roles in:

• Preserving cultural heritage that might otherwise have been lost
• Advocating for genocide recognition in their adopted countries
• Documenting survivor testimonies and family histories
• Creating memorial institutions and educational programs
• Supporting the independent Republic of Armenia established in 1991

The genocides fundamentally altered the demographic and cultural landscape of Anatolia. Regions that had been home to diverse Christian communities for millennia became almost exclusively Muslim. Thousands of churches, schools, and cultural sites were destroyed or repurposed, effectively erasing much of the physical evidence of these communities' historical presence.

Armenian diaspora community gathering to commemorate the genocide anniversary.

Explore Survivor Testimonies

Access our digital archive of survivor testimonies, oral histories, and family memoirs that document firsthand accounts of the Ottoman Genocides.

Access Testimony Archive

The Ottoman Genocides in Modern Context

The Ottoman Genocides remain relevant today for several reasons:

Legal Precedent

The events influenced Raphael Lemkin, who coined the term "genocide" in 1943 and helped draft the UN Genocide Convention. Lemkin specifically cited the Armenian case as an example of genocide.

Historical Understanding

Studying these genocides provides insights into how ethnic nationalism, war, and state collapse can create conditions for mass atrocities against vulnerable minorities.

Contemporary Politics

The ongoing dispute over recognition affects international relations, particularly between Turkey, Armenia, and countries with significant Armenian diaspora populations.

The Ottoman Genocides also raise important questions about historical justice, reparations, and reconciliation. What obligations do successor states have for historical crimes? How can societies address historical traumas while moving toward reconciliation? These questions remain unresolved and contentious.

Annual commemoration ceremony for the victims of the Ottoman Genocides.

Conclusion: An Unhealed Historical Wound

More than a century after the Ottoman Genocides began, these events remain an open wound in modern history. For Armenians, Assyrians, and Greeks, the genocides represent not just historical events but foundational traumas that continue to shape their collective identities and communities.

The persistent denial by Turkey prevents the kind of historical reckoning that might lead to genuine reconciliation. Meanwhile, the international community's uneven recognition of these atrocities—with greater acknowledgment of the Armenian experience than that of Assyrians and Greeks—leaves many victims without full historical justice.

Understanding the Ottoman Genocides in their full historical context is essential not only for honoring the memory of those who perished but also for preventing similar atrocities in the future. As the world continues to grapple with ethnic and religious conflicts, the lessons of this dark chapter remain painfully relevant.

Deepen Your Understanding

Download our comprehensive educational resource pack on the Ottoman Genocides, including historical timelines, maps, primary source documents, and scholarly analyses.

Get Educational Resources

Why is the term "Ottoman Genocides" used instead of just "Armenian Genocide"?

The term "Ottoman Genocides" acknowledges that while Armenians were the most numerous victims, the Ottoman Empire's campaign of ethnic cleansing also targeted other Christian minorities, particularly Assyrians and Greeks. Using this broader term recognizes the shared suffering of multiple groups under the same genocidal policies.

How many countries officially recognize the Armenian Genocide?

As of 2023, more than 30 countries have formally recognized the Armenian Genocide, including the United States, France, Germany, Russia, and Canada. However, only about 9 of these countries also recognize the genocides against Assyrians and Greeks.

What evidence exists that these events constituted genocide?

Evidence includes Ottoman government documents, eyewitness accounts from diplomats and missionaries, survivor testimonies, photographs, and demographic studies. The International Association of Genocide Scholars has affirmed that the events meet the legal definition of genocide as established in the UN Genocide Convention.